U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

William L. Barrett v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 14, 1996

77 F.3d 467; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 7626; 1996 WL 63032 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

77 F.3d 467

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
William L. BARRETT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 95-1318.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 7, 1996.
Decided Feb. 14, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-93-620-5-F)

William L. Barrett, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Edwin Hamilton, III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his medical malpractice claim filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 2671-2680 (West 1994), and denying his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Barrett v. United States, No. CA-93-620-5-F (E.D.N.C. Jan. 13, 1995, Jan. 18, 1995, Feb. 7, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.