U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Richard Lamar Fenstermacher v. D.R. Guillory

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 15, 1996

77 F.3d 468; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 7792; 1996 WL 65880 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

77 F.3d 468

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Richard Lamar FENSTERMACHER, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
D.R. GUILLORY, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 95-7310.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 18, 1996.
Decided Feb. 15, 1996.

Richard Lamar Fenstermacher, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Drummond Bagwell, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Fenstermacher v. Guillory, No. CA-93-905-R (W.D.Va. Aug. 9, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.