U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

William Thomas Harper, III v. Ronald J. Angelone, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections

William Thomas Harper, III v. Ronald J. Angelone, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 26, 1996
77 F.3d 468; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 7775; 1996 WL 79432 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

William Thomas Harper, III v. Ronald J. Angelone, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections

Opinion

77 F.3d 468

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
William Thomas HARPER, III, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Ronald J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department of
Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 95-7597.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 7, 1996.
Decided Feb. 26, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-95-444-CV-2)

Oldric Joseph LaBell, Jr., Newport News, Virginia, for Appellant. Richard Bain Smith, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Harper v. Angelone, (E.D.Va. Sept. 6, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.