Rastaman Mtume Obalaji Mfume I, A/K/A Herbert Lee Bailey v. Gene Baker Bert Christy Gloria Smith Ethel Horton Earlene Ford
Rastaman Mtume Obalaji Mfume I, A/K/A Herbert Lee Bailey v. Gene Baker Bert Christy Gloria Smith Ethel Horton Earlene Ford
Opinion
77 F.3d 469
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Rastaman Mtume Obalaji MFUME I, a/k/a Herbert Lee Bailey,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Gene BAKER; Bert Christy; Gloria Smith; Ethel Horton;
Earlene Ford, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 95-7319.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 18, 1996.
Decided Feb. 15, 1996.
Rastaman Mtume Obalaji Mfume I, Appellant Pro Se. William Paul Griggs, GRIGGS, SPRUILL & HARRIS, Cheraw, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Mfume I v. Baker, No. CA-94-1840-0-20BD (D.S.C. Aug. 8, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.