U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

William A. MacGuire v. Sterling Proffitt

William A. MacGuire v. Sterling Proffitt
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 22, 1996
77 F.3d 469; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 7941; 1996 WL 75659 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

William A. MacGuire v. Sterling Proffitt

Opinion

77 F.3d 469

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
William A. MACGUIRE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Sterling PROFFITT, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 95-7198.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 7, 1996.
Decided Feb. 22, 1996.

William A. MacGuire, Appellant Pro Se. Helen Eckert Phillips, TUCKER & ASSOCIATES, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. MacGuire v. Proffitt, No. CA-95-735-R (W.D.Va. July 25, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.