U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Kim Leighton McBride v. L.T. Lester

Kim Leighton McBride v. L.T. Lester
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 21, 1996
77 F.3d 469; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 7945; 1996 WL 74542 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Kim Leighton McBride v. L.T. Lester

Opinion

77 F.3d 469

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Kim Leighton McBRIDE, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
L.T. LESTER, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 95-7129.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 7, 1996.
Decided Feb. 21, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CA-95-341-2)

Kim Leighton McBride, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant noted this appeal outside the thirty-day appeal period established by Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1), failed to obtain an extension of the appeal period within the additional thirty-day period provided by Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5), and is not entitled to relief under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). The time periods established by Fed. R.App. P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court entered its order on June 16, 1995; Appellant's notice of appeal was filed on July 26, 1995. Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period deprives this court of jurisdiction to consider this case. We therefore deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.