Lane v. Strickland
Lane v. Strickland
Opinion
77 F.3d 469
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Lloyd Steven LANE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Roosevelt STRICKLAND; Byron Walters; Barry Deese,
Defendants-Appellees,
and
G. Wayne SPEARS; Lynn C. Phillips; Carol Whitaker; H.R.
Brigman; John Williams; Jerry McQueen; L.W. Moore;
Sandra Thomas; Yvonne Locklear; Vicky Caulder; John
Bullock; James Sanderson; John R. Mills, Defendants.
No. 95-6874.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 7, 1996.
Decided Feb. 21, 1996.
Lloyd Steven Lane, Appellant Pro Se. Jacob Leonard Safron, Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lane v. Strickland, No. CA-93-352-5-F (E.D.N.C. Apr. 28, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.