U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Stuart Sanders v. Director, Department of Corrections Ronald Angelone, Director Mr. Cummins, Counselor Mr. Wright, Warden of Work Release Unit

Stuart Sanders v. Director, Department of Corrections Ronald Angelone, Director Mr. Cummins, Counselor Mr. Wright, Warden of Work Release Unit
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 26, 1996
77 F.3d 470; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 7966; 1996 WL 79345 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Stuart Sanders v. Director, Department of Corrections Ronald Angelone, Director Mr. Cummins, Counselor Mr. Wright, Warden of Work Release Unit

Opinion

77 F.3d 470

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Stuart SANDERS, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
DIRECTOR, Department of Corrections; Ronald Angelone,
Director; Mr. Cummins, Counselor; Mr. Wright,
Warden of Work Release Unit,
Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-7808.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 7, 1996.
Decided Feb. 26, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-94-796)

Stuart Sanders, Appellant Pro Se. Lance Bradford Leggitt, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Sanders v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, No. CA-94-796 (E.D.Va. Oct. 31, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.