Perkins v. Prince George's County Government
Perkins v. Prince George's County Government
Opinion
77 F.3d 470
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Nelda A. PERKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY GOVERNMENT; Prince George's County
Council; Animal Control Commission; Ronald
Simons; Jan Marks; Shellie Moore;
Nancy R. Reams, Dr.; Michael
Alteri, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 95-2602.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 7, 1996.
Decided Feb. 15, 1996.
Nelda A. Perkins, Appellant Pro Se. Sean Daniel Wallace, COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Upper Marlboro, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Perkins v. Prince George's County Gov't, No. CA-93-1305-DKC (D.Md. July 28, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.