U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Ardie D. Nolan, III Johnnie Rowe v. Randall Lee Bob Lanier Sergeant Johnson Charles Minggia

Ardie D. Nolan, III Johnnie Rowe v. Randall Lee Bob Lanier Sergeant Johnson Charles Minggia
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 22, 1996
77 F.3d 470; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 7973; 1996 WL 75238 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Ardie D. Nolan, III Johnnie Rowe v. Randall Lee Bob Lanier Sergeant Johnson Charles Minggia

Opinion

77 F.3d 470

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Ardie D. NOLAN, III; Johnnie Rowe, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Randall LEE; Bob Lanier; Sergeant Johnson; Charles
Minggia, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-7507.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 7, 1996.
Decided Feb. 22, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-95-644-5-CT-H)

Ardie D. Nolan, III, Johnnie Rowe, Appellants Pro Se.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellants appeal from the district court's order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Nolan v. Lee, No. CA-95-644-5-CT-H (E.D.N.C. Sept. 14, 1995). We deny Appellant Nolan's motion for an injunction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.