U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Roy Smith v. Jim Hunt, Governor Franklin E. Freeman, Jr. Ronnie Stewart Jimmy Privette

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 22, 1996

77 F.3d 471; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 8133; 1996 WL 75616 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

77 F.3d 471

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Roy SMITH, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Jim HUNT, Governor; Franklin E. Freeman, Jr.; Ronnie
Stewart; Jimmy Privette, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-7505.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 7, 1996.
Decided Feb. 22, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-94-318-BO)

Roy Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Mark J. Pletzke, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina; John A. Maxfield, COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Smith v. Hunt, No. CA-94-318-BO (E.D.N.C. Sept. 15, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.