U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

United States v. Glen Mark, Jr.

United States v. Glen Mark, Jr.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 26, 1996
77 F.3d 472; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 8160; 1996 WL 79386 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

United States v. Glen Mark, Jr.

Opinion

77 F.3d 472

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee,
v.
Glen MARK, Jr., Defendant--Appellant.

No. 95-7706.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 7, 1996.
Decided Feb. 26, 1996.

Glen Mark, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Harry L. Hobgood, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

M.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Mark, Nos. CR-89-263-G; CA-95-112-2 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 10, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.