U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

United States v. Abel Parama Borromeo

United States v. Abel Parama Borromeo
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 29, 1996
78 F.3d 579; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 10513; 1996 WL 85163 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

United States v. Abel Parama Borromeo

Opinion

78 F.3d 579

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Abel Parama BORROMEO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 95-6713.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 13, 1996.
Decided Feb. 29, 1996.

Abel Parama Borromeo, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Michael Horn, Assistant United States Attorney, Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before HAMILTON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's garnishment order. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Borromeo, No. CR-89-241 (S.D.W.Va. Apr. 19, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.