G. David Broyles Emily Broyles Citizens Bank of Maryland v. Roger Schlossberg, Trustee
Cases that cite this one
10 later published cases cite this decision.
- (SS)(PS) Cornwell v. Commissioner of Social Security (United States District Court for the Eastern District of California 2020)
- (SS) Alcala v. Commissioner of Social Security (United States District Court for the Eastern District of California 2021)
- (SS) Wofford v. Commissioner of Social Security (United States District Court for the Eastern District of California 2021)
- (SS) Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Security (United States District Court for the Eastern District of California 2021)
- (SS) Rochert v. Commissioner of Social Security (United States District Court for the Eastern District of California 2021)
- (SS)Lemay v. Commissioner of Social Security (United States District Court for the Eastern District of California 2019)
- (SS) Vue v. Commissioner of Social Security (United States District Court for the Eastern District of California 2022)
- Smith v. Kijakazi (United States District Court for the Northern District of California 2022)
- Neubauer v. Kijakazi (District Court, E.D. Washington 2021)
- Bradt v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration (United States District Court for the District of Arizona 2020)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge WILLIAMS wrote the opinion, in which Judge LUTTIG and Judge NORTON joined.
OPINION
After oral 'argument, we certified the following question to the Court of Appeals of Maryland:
Pursuant to Maryland Rule 2-611(d), what is the effect on the lien status of a confessed judgment when the state court *28 “opens” the judgment for a hearing on the merits without affirmatively stating that the judgment lien is preserved[?]
Agreeing with the well-reasoned opinion of the bankruptcy court, the Court of Appeals of Maryland concluded that opening a confessed judgment does not destroy the validity of the underlying judgment lien:
We hold that opening a confessed judgment is a procedure that allows the court to consider the merits of the defendant’s defense to the action without destroying the judgment’s validity. The judgment, and any judgment lien derived from it, remain in effect while the court considers the merits of the defense.
We reject the Trustee’s contention that opening a confessed judgment destroys the validity of the underlying judgment lien unless the court order contains express affirmative language preserving the judgment.
Schlossberg v. Citizens Bank of Md., 341 Md. 650, 659-60, 672 A.2d 625, 629 (1996). Because the priority status of the judgment lien is unaffected by its opening, we hold that the district court properly affirmed the bankruptcy court’s lifting the automatic stay to permit the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County to determine the validity and amount of the confessed judgment. The judgment of the district court, therefore, is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.