Bayerle v. Bucklew
Bayerle v. Bucklew
Opinion
81 F.3d 148
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Martin G. BAYERLE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Neil S. BUCKLEW; Richard Adams; Cathy M. Armstrong; Kay
Goodwin; David C. Hardesty, Jr.; John R. Hoblitzell; John
G. Hopkins, V; Lucia B. James; Charles W. Manning; Henry
R. Marockie; Paul R. Martinelli; Jon A. Mcbride; Robert
A. McMillan; A. Michael Perry; Joseph W. Powell; C. Allan
Roberts; Henry G. Taylor; David G. Todd; Clifford M.
Trump, Trustees, Individually; Robert M. Bastress; Thomas
Cady; Lisa Eichhorn; Robert G. Lathrop; Majorie
McDiarmid, Committee Members, Individually, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 95-2054.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 21, 1996.
Decided: March 29, 1996.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. William M. Kidd, Senior District Judge. (CA-94-144)
Martin G. Bayerle, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Randolph Brooks, FURBEE, AMOS, WEBB & CRITCHFIELD, Fairmont, WV, for Appellees.
N.D.W.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bayerle v. Bucklew, No. CA-94-144 (N.D.W.Va. Apr. 28, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.