Atkins v. Murphy
Atkins v. Murphy
Opinion
81 F.3d 148
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Anthony ATKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Sandra MURPHY, Head Nurse, August Correctional Center; Mark
Nelson, LPN, Augusta Correctional Center; Julian Snyder,
LPN, Augusta Correctional Center; R. Smiley, Sergeant;
Edward D. Carey, Doctor, Augusta Correctional Center; T.
Redman, Lieutenant, Augusta Correctional Center; J.H. Lyle,
Lieutenant, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 95-6748.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 28, 1995.
Decided: March 26, 1996.
Anthony Atkins, Appellant Pro Se.
Colin James Steuart Thomas, III, TIMBERLAKE, SMITH, THOMAS & MOSES, PC, Staunton, Virginia; Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Atkins v. Murphy, No. CA-94-240-R (W.D.Va. Apr. 5, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.