U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Nathaniel Ellerbe, Jr. v. Robert Anderson Clarence Hall, and Willis Griffin Alvia Sutton

Nathaniel Ellerbe, Jr. v. Robert Anderson Clarence Hall, and Willis Griffin Alvia Sutton
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 4, 1996
81 F.3d 149; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 13963; 1996 WL 156498 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Nathaniel Ellerbe, Jr. v. Robert Anderson Clarence Hall, and Willis Griffin Alvia Sutton

Opinion

81 F.3d 149

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Nathaniel ELLERBE, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Robert ANDERSON; Clarence Hall, Defendants-Appellees,
and
Willis GRIFFIN; Alvia Sutton, Defendants.

No. 95-7430.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 21, 1996.
Decided: April 4, 1996.

Nathaniel Ellerbe, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Sylvia Hargett Thibaut, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, NC, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the grant of summary judgment on qualified immunity grounds. Ellerbe v. Anderson, No. CA-94-19-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Aug. 23, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.