U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Perry Shippy v. T. Whitaker Officer Armstrong Officer Camby

Perry Shippy v. T. Whitaker Officer Armstrong Officer Camby
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 4, 1996
81 F.3d 151; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 14027; 1996 WL 156524 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Perry Shippy v. T. Whitaker Officer Armstrong Officer Camby

Opinion

81 F.3d 151

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Perry SHIPPY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
T. WHITAKER; Officer Armstrong; Officer Camby, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-7373.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 21, 1996.
Decided April 4, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-95-693-5-CT-BO)

Perry Shippy, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Shippy v. Whitaker, No. CA-95-693-5-CT-BO (E.D.N.C. Aug. 24, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.