U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

United States v. Terry Lamar Brice

United States v. Terry Lamar Brice
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 2, 1996
81 F.3d 151; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 14033; 1996 WL 148158 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

United States v. Terry Lamar Brice

Opinion

81 F.3d 151

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Terry Lamar BRICE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 95-7189.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 21, 1996.
Decided: April 2, 1996.

Terry Lamar Brice, Appellant Pro Se. David Calhoun Stephens, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, SC, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for reconsideration in this 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Brice v. United States, No. CR-92-328; CA-95-701 (D.S.C. July 18, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.