U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

United States v. Thaddius Cedewa Rhames

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 2, 1996

81 F.3d 152; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 14072; 1996 WL 148343 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

81 F.3d 152

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Thaddius Cedewa RHAMES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 95-6715.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 21, 1996.
Decided April 2, 1996.

Thaddius Cedewa Rhames, Appellant Pro Se. Scott Patrick Mebane, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Rhames, Nos. CR-93-69; CA-94-533-2 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 17, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.