U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

United States v. Bernardo Ospina

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 21, 1996

81 F.3d 152; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 14091; 1996 WL 128281 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

81 F.3d 152

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee,
v.
Bernardo OSPINA, Defendant--Appellant.

No. 95-7809.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 12, 1996.
Decided March 21, 1996.

Bernardo Ospina, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Joseph Leiser, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before ERVIN, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Ospina, Nos. CR-90-346-A; CA-95-636-AM (E.D.Va. Sept. 20, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.