U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Robert Lee Brock, A/K/A Two Souls Walker v. Virginia Department of Corrections

Robert Lee Brock, A/K/A Two Souls Walker v. Virginia Department of Corrections
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 12, 1996
82 F.3d 409; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 21054; 1996 WL 173346 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Robert Lee Brock, A/K/A Two Souls Walker v. Virginia Department of Corrections

Opinion

82 F.3d 409

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Robert Lee BROCK, a/k/a Two Souls Walker, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant--Appellee.

No. 95-7987.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 21, 1996.
Decided April 12, 1996.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (MISC-95-45-N).

Robert Lee Brock, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his attempt to file a complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Brock v. Department of Corrections, No. MISC-95-45-N (E.D.Va. Nov. 14, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.