Buckner v. Warden
Buckner v. Warden
Opinion
82 F.3d 409
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Robert Leon BUCKNER; Vicki Lorraine White, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
and
Gerald DAVIS FULLER; Maurice Lively; Allen Edward Mapp;
James Moyer; Kevin Farrow; Daniel Gardner; Paul Leo
Davis; Gary Ireland; Mathew Porter; John Tracy Courtney;
Delmar Patrick; James Harrison; George Sams; Clarence
Pruitt; Mark McMillan; Shane McCallum; Clint Myers;
Steven Bradley, Plaintiffs,
v.
WARDEN, Eastern Correctional Institution; Warden, Maryland
Correctional Institution for Women; Commissioner
of Correction, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 96-6005.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 21, 1996.
Decided April 16, 1996.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA-95-3476-S)
Robert Leon Buckner, Vicki Lorraine White, Appellants Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellants appeal from the district court's order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Buckner v. Warden, No. CA-95-3476-S (D.Md. Dec. 6, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.