Thomas Eugene Langston v. Warden, Mecklenberg Correctional Center
Thomas Eugene Langston v. Warden, Mecklenberg Correctional Center
Opinion
82 F.3d 410
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Thomas Eugene LANGSTON, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
WARDEN, Mecklenberg Correctional Center, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 95-8560.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 29, 1996.
Decided April 19, 1996.
E.D.Va.
DISMISSED.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CA-95-454-AM)
Thomas Eugene Langston, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Drummond Bagwell, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Langston v. Warden, No. CA-95-454-AM (E.D.Va. Dec. 1, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.