U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Earl P. Anderson v. Rufus Fleming, Warden Nurse Minnix Nurse Fitzgerald C. Berkley, Nurse M. Epperson, Nurse

Earl P. Anderson v. Rufus Fleming, Warden Nurse Minnix Nurse Fitzgerald C. Berkley, Nurse M. Epperson, Nurse
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 30, 1996
83 F.3d 414; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 22128; 1996 WL 209578 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Earl P. Anderson v. Rufus Fleming, Warden Nurse Minnix Nurse Fitzgerald C. Berkley, Nurse M. Epperson, Nurse

Opinion

83 F.3d 414

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Earl P. ANDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Rufus FLEMING, Warden; Nurse Minnix; Nurse Fitzgerald; C.
Berkley, Nurse; M. Epperson, Nurse, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-7980.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 15, 1996.
Decided: April 30, 1996.

Earl P. Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, VA; John Baldwin Catlett, Jr., SANDS, ANDERSON, MARKS & MILLER, Richmond, VA, for Appellees.

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Anderson v. Fleming, No. CA-95-374-AM (E.D. Va. Sept. 25 & Nov. 16, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.