U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Samuel C. Miller v. State of South Carolina T. Travis Medlock

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 23, 1996

83 F.3d 415; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 23638; 1996 WL 194204 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

83 F.3d 415

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Samuel C. MILLER, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
STATE of South Carolina; T. Travis Medlock, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 95-7403.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 15, 1996.
Decided April 23, 1996.

Samuel C. Miller, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Miller v. South Carolina, No. CA-94-1970-3-18BD (D.S.C. Aug. 24, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.