Julian Edward Rochester v. Greg Reed, Deputy Steve Pruitt Rick Thompkins
Julian Edward Rochester v. Greg Reed, Deputy Steve Pruitt Rick Thompkins
Opinion
83 F.3d 415
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Julian Edward ROCHESTER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Greg REED, Deputy; Steve Pruitt; Rick Thompkins,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 96-6106.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 15, 1996.
Decided May 3, 1996.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. William B. Traxler, Jr., District Judge. (CA-95-2278-2-21AJ)
Julian Edward Rochester, Appellant Pro Se.
D.S.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief without prejudice on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Rochester v. Reed, No. CA-95-2278-2-21AJ (D.S.C. Dec. 28, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.