U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

United States v. Jack Blalock, Sr.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 23, 1996

83 F.3d 416; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 23676; 1996 WL 194214 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

83 F.3d 416

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee,
v.
Jack BLALOCK, sr., Defendant--Appellant.

No. 95-7304.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 15, 1996.
Decided April 23, 1996.

Jack Blalock, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. David Calhoun Stephens, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Blalock, Nos. CR-90-394; CA-95-1662-3-6 (D.S.C. July 27, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.