U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

United States v. Gary C. Crouch

United States v. Gary C. Crouch
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 30, 1996
83 F.3d 416; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 23661; 1996 WL 209583 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

United States v. Gary C. Crouch

Opinion

83 F.3d 416

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Gary C. CROUCH, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 95-7975.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 15, 1996.
Decided: April 30, 1996.

Gary C. Crouch, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, SC, for Appellee.

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Crouch, Nos. CR-91-397; CR-91-310; CA-94-3237-3-19BC (D.S.C. Oct. 27, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.