U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Rothwell v. Campbell

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 25, 1996

83 F.3d 416; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 23663; 1996 WL 199430 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

83 F.3d 416

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
James Calvin ROTHWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Carroll A. CAMPBELL, Governor, State of South Carolina;
Parker Evatt, Commissioner, South Carolina
Department of Corrections; Gene Baker;
Tony Ellis, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-7691.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 15, 1996.
Decided: April 25, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. C. Weston Houck, Chief District Judge. (CA-93-2194-2-2AJ)

James Calvin Rothwell, Appellant Pro Se. John Gregg McMaster, Jr., TOMPKINS & MCMASTER, Columbia, South Carolina; Robert Eric Petersen, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Rothwell v. Campbell, No. CA-93-2194-2-2AJ (D.S.C. Oct. 3, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.