U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Ahmed R. Rucker v. Robert Patton, Detective, Homicide Division--Baltimore City Police Department

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 23, 1996

83 F.3d 416; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 23669; 1996 WL 194193 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

83 F.3d 416

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Ahmed R. RUCKER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Robert PATTON, Detective, Homicide Division--Baltimore City
Police Department, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 95-7517.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 15, 1996.
Decided April 23, 1996.

Ahmed R. Rucker, Appellant Pro Se.

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Rucker v. Patton, No. CA-94-3515-WMN (D.Md. Aug. 22, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.