U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

William Ray Vawter, Jr. v. Joseph Loftin Mr. Crouthamel Officer Goodman

William Ray Vawter, Jr. v. Joseph Loftin Mr. Crouthamel Officer Goodman
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 30, 1996
83 F.3d 417; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 23687; 1996 WL 209576 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

William Ray Vawter, Jr. v. Joseph Loftin Mr. Crouthamel Officer Goodman

Opinion

83 F.3d 417

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
William Ray VAWTER, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Joseph LOFTIN; Mr. Crouthamel; Officer Goodman,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-7988.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 15, 1996.
Decided: April 30, 1996.

William Ray Vawter, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Vawter v. Loftin, No. CA-95-752-5-CT-F (E.D.N.C. Nov. 2, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.