Samuel Boyd, Jr. v. Learned D. Barry, Deputy Commonwealth Attorney
Samuel Boyd, Jr. v. Learned D. Barry, Deputy Commonwealth Attorney
Opinion
85 F.3d 615
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Samuel BOYD, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Learned D. BARRY, Deputy Commonwealth Attorney, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 96-6039
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 15, 1996.
Decided May 2, 1996.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-95-571)
Samuel Boyd, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Boyd v. Barry, No. CA-95-571 (E.D.Va. Dec. 21, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.