U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

United States v. Lonnie Glen Schmidt

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 2, 1996

85 F.3d 618; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 31999; 1996 WL 219591 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

85 F.3d 618

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Lonnie Glen SCHMIDT, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 95-7993.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 15, 1996.
Decided: May 2, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CR-89-114-C, CA-95-338-3-P).

Lonnie Glen Schmidt, Appellant Pro Se. Jerry Wayne Miller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

W.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Schmidt, Nos. CR-89-114-C; CA-95-338-3-P (W.D.N.C. Nov. 6, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.