U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Iszard Ballard, Jr. v. Parris N. Glendening Joseph Curran, Jr. Bishop L. Robinson Richard A. Lanham, Sr. Earl Beshears Ralph Logan

Iszard Ballard, Jr. v. Parris N. Glendening Joseph Curran, Jr. Bishop L. Robinson Richard A. Lanham, Sr. Earl Beshears Ralph Logan
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 3, 1996
86 F.3d 1148; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 42432; 1996 WL 289053 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Iszard Ballard, Jr. v. Parris N. Glendening Joseph Curran, Jr. Bishop L. Robinson Richard A. Lanham, Sr. Earl Beshears Ralph Logan

Opinion

86 F.3d 1148

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Iszard BALLARD, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Parris N. GLENDENING; Joseph Curran, Jr.; Bishop L.
Robinson; Richard A. Lanham, Sr.; Earl Beshears;
Ralph Logan, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-8585.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 16, 1996.
Decided June 3, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-95-1630-JFM)

Iszard Ballard, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Audrey J.S. Carrion, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ballard v. Glendening, No. CA-95-1630-JFM (D.Md. Nov. 20, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.