Brock v. Smith
Brock v. Smith
Opinion
86 F.3d 1148
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Robert Lee BROCK, a/k/a Two Souls Walker, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Anita SMITH, M.D., Medical Director of Valley Community
Services; Patricia Porter, M S W, Forensic
Evaluator, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 96-6040.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 16, 1996.
Decided May 28, 1996.
Robert Lee Brock, Appellant Pro Se.
Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. The district court assessed a filing fee in accordance with Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and dismissed the case without prejudice when Appellant failed to comply with the fee order. Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.