U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Quincy Davis v. Frank Drew, Sheriff, Personally and Officially Captain O'brien, Personally and Officially Lieutenant Ortiz, Personally and Officially

Quincy Davis v. Frank Drew, Sheriff, Personally and Officially Captain O'brien, Personally and Officially Lieutenant Ortiz, Personally and Officially
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 21, 1996
86 F.3d 1149; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 42200; 1996 WL 267315 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Quincy Davis v. Frank Drew, Sheriff, Personally and Officially Captain O'brien, Personally and Officially Lieutenant Ortiz, Personally and Officially

Opinion

86 F.3d 1149

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Quincy DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Frank DREW, Sheriff, personally and officially; Captain
O'Brien, personally and officially; Lieutenant
Ortiz, personally and officially,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-7205.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 26, 1995.
Decided: May 21, 1996.

Quincy Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Bruce Christopher Sams, SAMS & HAWKINS, P.C., Norfolk, VA, for Appellees.

Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, and HALL and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Davis v. Drew, No. CA-94-499-2 (E.D.Va. Aug. 1, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.