David S. Cousins v. James Wilder
David S. Cousins v. James Wilder
Opinion
86 F.3d 1149
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
David S. COUSINS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
James WILDER, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 95-7836.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 15, 1996.
Decided: May 21, 1996.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-95-779-5-H)
David S. Cousins, Appellant Pro Se.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Cousins v. Wilder, No. CA-95-779-5-H (E.D.N.C. Nov. 7, 1995). We deny the motion for oral argument and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.