Cleveland Hughes v. Sewall Smith, Warden Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cleveland Hughes v. Sewall Smith, Warden Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Opinion
86 F.3d 1150
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Cleveland HUGHES, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Sewall SMITH, Warden; Attorney General of the State of
Maryland, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 95-7425.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: January 9, 1996.
Decided: May 24, 1996.
Cleveland Hughes, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Mary Ellen Barbera, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, and MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hughes v. Smith, No. CA-92-2738-N (D.Md. Aug. 23, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.