U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Hester v. Geise

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 3, 1996

86 F.3d 1150; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 42457; 1996 WL 289061 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

86 F.3d 1150

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Steven E. HESTER, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Jack GEISE, U.S. Attorney; Bonnie Greenberg, U.S.A.; Laura
Gwinn, States Attorney; S.P. Stowe, FBI; Ed Ryan, FBI;
Mark Valderez, FBI; Maurice Hicks, P.G. Police; Detective
Babcock, P.G. Police, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-8600.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

June 3, 1996

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-95-3552-AMD)

D.Md. SY AFFIRMED.

Steven E. Hester, Appellant Pro Se.

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hester v. Geise, No. CA-95-3552-AMD (D.Md. Dec. 7, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.