U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Nellie Myers Higgs v. Doctor MacInlawyne Doctor Degen David Crawford, Doctor

Nellie Myers Higgs v. Doctor MacInlawyne Doctor Degen David Crawford, Doctor
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 28, 1996
86 F.3d 1150; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 42241; 1996 WL 279005 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Nellie Myers Higgs v. Doctor MacInlawyne Doctor Degen David Crawford, Doctor

Opinion

86 F.3d 1150

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Nellie Myers HIGGS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Doctor MACINLAWYNE; Doctor Degen; David Crawford, Doctor,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-2321.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 16, 1996.
Decided May 28, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-95-521-R)

Nellie Myers Higgs, Appellant Pro Se.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief without prejudice on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Higgs v. MacInlawyne, No. CA-95-521-R (W.D.Va. June 6, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.