Karon Ann Parham v. Pepsico, Incorporated
Karon Ann Parham v. Pepsico, Incorporated
Opinion
86 F.3d 1151
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Karon Ann PARHAM, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
PEPSICO, INCORPORATED, Defendant--Appellee.
No. 95-3217.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 16, 1996.
Decided May 28, 1996.
Karon Ann Parham, Appellant Pro Se.
Louis B. Meyer, III, POYNER & SPRUILL, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing her trademark and copyright infringement claims and state law claims. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Parham v. Pepsico, Inc., No. CA-95-307-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Nov. 28, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.