U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Timothy S. Laing v. Lynn Armentrout, Sheriff Ronald Brinkley, Lieutenant R. Jenkins T. Campbell

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 3, 1996

86 F.3d 1151; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 42460; 1996 WL 289055 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

86 F.3d 1151

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Timothy S. LAING, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Lynn ARMENTROUT, Sheriff; Ronald Brinkley, Lieutenant; R.
Jenkins; T. Campbell, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-8575.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 16, 1996.
Decided June 3, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CA-95-527-R)

Timothy S. Laing, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Dudley Obenshain, WHARTON, ALDHIZER & WEAVER, Harrisonburg, Virginia, for Appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Laing v. Armentrout, No. CA-95-527-R (W.D.Va. Dec. 12, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.