Slappy v. Martin
Slappy v. Martin
Opinion
86 F.3d 1152
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Isaac Eugene SLAPPY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
R. MARTIN, Investigator, Lee Correctional Institution;
Parker Evatt, Commissioner, South Carolina Department of
Corrections; William C. Wallace, Warden, Lee Correctional
Institution, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 95-7712.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 16, 1996.
Decided May 29, 1996.
D.S.C.
AFFIRMED.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. C. Weston Houck, Chief District Judge. (CA-94-1445-2BD)
Isaac Eugene Slappy, Appellant Pro Se.
George Coggin James, Sr., RICHARDSON, JAMES & PLAYER, Sumter, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Slappy v. Martin, No. CA-94-1445-2BD (D.S.C. Oct. 2, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.