U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

United States v. Anthony Vanzetti Thomas

United States v. Anthony Vanzetti Thomas
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 24, 1996
86 F.3d 1154; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 42304; 1996 WL 276951 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

United States v. Anthony Vanzetti Thomas

Opinion

86 F.3d 1154

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Anthony Vanzetti THOMAS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 95-6907.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: October 24, 1995.
Decided: May 24, 1996.

Anthony Vanzetti Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Michael R. Smythers, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, and HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Thomas, No. CR-87-175-A (E.D.Va. May 3, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.