U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

United States v. Daniel Ray Watson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 3, 1996

86 F.3d 1154; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 42310; 1996 WL 289044 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

86 F.3d 1154

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Daniel Ray WATSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 96-6009.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 16, 1996.
Decided June 3, 1996.

Daniel Ray Watson, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Stanley Feinberg, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for transcripts of contempt hearings. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Watson, Nos. CR-87-15; CA-95-1061 (S.D.W.Va. Dec. 29, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.