Mark Anthony Dennis v. James B. Hunt, Jr.
Mark Anthony Dennis v. James B. Hunt, Jr.
Opinion
87 F.3d 1308
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Mark Anthony DENNIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
James B. HUNT, Jr., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 96-6136.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 16, 1996.
Decided June 5, 1996.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Salisbury. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CA-95-466).
Mark Anthony Dennis, Appellant Pro Se. Mark J. Pletzke, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
M.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Dennis v. Hunt, No. CA-95-466 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 14, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.