Martin v. Heckett
Martin v. Heckett
Opinion
87 F.3d 1309
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Henry W. MARTIN, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Lynn HECKETT, Doctor; Lawrence J. Minette, Doctor;
Barnwell Meyer, III, Doctor; Jeffrey Mckee, Doctor; Gene
Dixon, Doctor; Robert S. Hansen, Ph.D.; Karl V. Doskoch,
Doctor; Herbert D. Smith, Doctor; Jose Chavez, Doctor;
Doctor Galvarino; Doctor Chambers, Doctor; O.W. William,
Doctor; V.T. Smith, Doctor; William S. Hall, Md,
Psychiatric Institute; John T. Gentry, Judge; Frank Epps,
Judge; Frankie P. Mcgowan, Judge; Victor Pyle, Jr., Judge;
Gerald Smoak, Judge, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 96-6255.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 16, 1996.
Decided: June 5, 1996.
Henry W. Martin, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Martin v. Heckett, No. CA-95-2310-6-0AK (D.S.C. Jan. 25, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.