U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

United States v. Francina Margarita Jemmott

United States v. Francina Margarita Jemmott
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 5, 1996
87 F.3d 1309; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 32172; 1996 WL 295282 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

United States v. Francina Margarita Jemmott

Opinion

87 F.3d 1309

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Francina Margarita JEMMOTT, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 96-6102.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 16, 1996.
Decided June 5, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CR-92-33, CA-95-956-5-H)

Francina Margarita Jemmott, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Edwin Hamilton, III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

E.D.N.C.

DISMISSED.

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying her 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Jemmott, Nos. CR-92-93; CA-95-956-5-H (E.D.N.C. Dec. 12, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.