Scott E. Ring v. Ron Angelone
Scott E. Ring v. Ron Angelone
Opinion
87 F.3d 1309
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Scott E. RING, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Ron ANGELONE, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 96-6142.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 16, 1996.
Decided June 5, 1996.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CA-96-1-MC-R).
Scott E. Ring, Appellant Pro Se.
W.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for a temporary restraining order and/or a preliminary injunction. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ring v. Angelone, No. CA-96-1-MC-R (W.D.Va. Jan. 5, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.